
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; 2 IARC, Lyon, France; 3 Division of Cancer Epidemiology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Germany; 4 Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany; 5 Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; 6 Medical Department V, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 7 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 8 Departments of Epidemiology and Urology, University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 9 Centre for Nutrition and Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; 10 Medical Research Council Dunn Human Nutrition Unit and Medical Research Council Centre for Nutritional Epidemiology in Cancer Prevention and Survival, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge; 11 Clinical Gerontology Unit, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 12 Cancer Registry, Azienda Ospedaliera "Civile M.P. Arezzo," Ragusa, Italy; 13 Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; 14 Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy; 15 Department of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Center for Cancer Prevention-Piemonte, Torino, Italy; 16 Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, Center for Study and Prevention of Cancer, Scientific Institute of Tuscany, Florence, Italy; 17 Public Health and Health Planning Directorate, Asturias, Spain; 18 Public Health Institute of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; 19 Department of Epidemiology, Murcia Health Council, Murcia, Spain; 20 Public Health Department of Gipuzkoa, Basque Government, San Sebastian, Spain; 21 Department of Epidemiology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; 22 Escuela Andaluza de Salud Publica, Granada, Spain; 23 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens Medical School; 24 Hellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece; and 25 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Naomi E. Allen, Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-289600; Fax: 44-1865-289610. E-mail: naomi.allen{at}ceu.ox.ac.uk
Background: Some studies suggest that elevated serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I concentrations are associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer and, in particular, with an increased risk of advanced-stage prostate cancer.
Methods: We analyzed the association between prediagnostic serum concentrations of IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) and prostate cancer risk in a case-control study nested in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. This study includes 630 incident prostate cancer cases and 630 matched control subjects. Odds ratios and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated for prostate cancer risk associated with increasing IGF-I and IGFBP-3 concentrations using conditional logistic regression.
Results: The risk of total prostate cancer in the highest versus the lowest third of serum peptide concentration was 1.35 (95% CI, 0.99-1.82; Ptrend = 0.08) for IGF-I, 1.39 (95% CI, 1.02-1.89; Ptrend = 0.12) for the IGF-I residuals after adjusting for IGFBP-3, 1.22 (95% CI, 0.92-1.64; Ptrend = 0.38) for IGFBP-3, and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.74-1.37; Ptrend = 0.75) for the IGFBP-3 residuals after adjusting for IGF-I. There was no significant difference in the association of peptide hormones and prostate cancer by stage of disease, although the association of serum IGF-I concentration with risk was slightly stronger for advanced-stage disease; the odds ratio for the highest versus the lowest third was 1.65 (95% CI, 0.88-3.08; Ptrend = 0.21) for IGF-I and 1.76 (95% CI, 0.92-3.40; Ptrend = 0.11) for IGF-I adjusted for IGFBP-3.
Conclusions: In this large nested case-control study, serum IGF-I concentration is not strongly associated with prostate cancer risk, although the results are compatible with a small increase in risk, particularly for advanced-stage disease; no association for IGFBP-3 was observed. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(6):11217)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Braconi, R. Bracci, I. Bearzi, F. Bianchi, S. Sabato, A. Mandolesi, L. Belvederesi, S. Cascinu, N. Valeri, and R. Cellerino Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) 1 and 2 help to predict disease outcome in GIST patients Ann. Onc., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1293 - 1298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Minami, T. Tochigi, S. Kawamura, H. Tateno, S. Hoshi, Y. Nishino, and M. Kuwahara Height, Urban-born and Prostate Cancer Risk in Japanese Men Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 38(3): 205 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Borugian, J. J. Spinelli, Z. Sun, L. N. Kolonel, I. Oakley-Girvan, M. D. Pollak, A. S. Whittemore, A. H. Wu, and R. P. Gallagher Prostate Cancer Risk in Relation to Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)-I and IGF-Binding Protein-3: A Prospective Multiethnic Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 252 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |