This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by MacKinnon, J. A. Articles by Wilkinson, J. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by MacKinnon, J. A. Articles by Wilkinson, J. D.

Detecting an Association between Socioeconomic Status and Late Stage Breast Cancer Using Spatial Analysis and Area-Based Measures

¹ Florida Cancer Data System, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; ² Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Miami, Florida; and ³ Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology, Tallahassee, Florida

Requests for reprints: Jill A. MacKinnon, Florida Cancer Data System, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, P.O. Box 016960 (D4-11), Miami, FL 33101. Phone: 305-243-3426; Fax: 305-243-4871. E-mail: jill_mackinnon{at}miami.edu

Objectives: To assess the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and late stage breast cancer using the cluster detection software SaTScan and U.S. census–derived area-based socioeconomic measures.

Materials and Methods: Florida's 18,683 women diagnosed with late stage breast cancer (regional or distant stage) between 1998 and 2002 as identified by Florida's population–based, statewide, incidence registry were analyzed by SaTScan to identify areas of higher-than-expected incidence. The relationship between SES and late stage breast cancer was assessed at the neighborhood (block group) level by combining the SaTScan results with area-based SES data.

Results: SaTScan identified 767 of Florida's 9,112 block groups that had higher-than-expected incidence of late stage breast cancer. After controlling for patient level insurance status, county level mammography prevalence, and urban/rural residence in the logistic regression model, women living in neighborhoods of severe and near poverty were respectively 3.0 and 1.6 times more likely to live in areas of higher-than-expected incidence of late stage breast cancer when compared with women living in nonpoverty. Additionally, areas in the lowest quartile of mammography usage were almost seven times more likely to have higher-than-expected incidence than areas in the higher quartiles.

Conclusions: In addition to confirming the importance of mammography, results from the present study suggest that "where" you live plays an important role in defining the risk of presenting with late stage breast cancer. Additional research is urgently needed to understand this risk and to leverage the strengths and resources present in all communities to lower the late stage breast cancer burden. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(4):756–62)