This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Data Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boffetta, P. Articles by de Vocht, F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boffetta, P. Articles by de Vocht, F.

Occupation and the Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

IARC, Lyon, France

Requests for reprints: Paolo Boffetta, Gene-Environment Epidemiology Group, IARC, 150 cours Albert-Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France. Phone: 33-4-72738441; Fax: 33-4-72738320. E-mail: boffetta{at}iarc.fr

Although thus far no occupational agents have been classified as established causes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), employment as a farmer, teacher, dry cleaner, meat worker, printer, or wood worker has been associated with elevated risk in the peer-reviewed literature. We conducted several meta-analyses to assess risk in these occupations and industries from articles published in MEDLINE up to August 1, 2006. The summary risk estimates suggest a homogeneous excess risk for NHL among workers in the printing industry [relative risk (RR), 1.86; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.37-2.52] and wood workers (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31). Considerable heterogeneity but elevated risks were found for farmers (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17), especially in animal husbandry (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08-1.60), and teaching (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.34-1.61). An increased risk was absent for employment in the meat processing industry (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.29). These results suggest that although excess risk is found for employment in the printing industry, wood processing industry, teaching, and farming, it is unlikely that occupation represents a major risk factor for NHL in most populations. At present, no conclusive evidence of causal relations between occupations and increased NHL risk exists; this can be ascribed to methodologic problems in studying the link between NHL risk and occupation, including heterogeneity of disease and exposure circumstances and low statistical power. Implementing state-of-the-art exposure assessment technologies, including biomarker-based assessment, and aiming to identify susceptible subgroups can increase the statistical power enough to analyze etiologically relevant NHL subtypes and provide clues on possible causal agents in future studies. These goals can be best attained within the framework of large-scale, international collaborative projects. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(3):369–72)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M Schenk, M P Purdue, J S Colt, P Hartge, A Blair, P Stewart, J R Cerhan, A J De Roos, W Cozen, and R K Severson Occupation/industry and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the United States Occup. Environ. Med., January 1, 2009; 66(1): 23 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A t Mannetje, E Dryson, C Walls, D McLean, F McKenzie, M Maule, S Cheng, C Cunningham, H Kromhout, P Boffetta, et al. High risk occupations for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in New Zealand: case-control study Occup. Environ. Med., May 1, 2008; 65(5): 354 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]