This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boardman, L. A. Articles by Thibodeau, S. N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boardman, L. A. Articles by Thibodeau, S. N.

Frequency of Defective DNA Mismatch Repair in Colorectal Cancer among the Alaska Native People

¹ Division of Gastroenterology, ² Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, and ³ Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota and ⁴ Office of Alaska Native Health Research, Division of Community Health Services, Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium, Anchorage, Alaska

Requests for reprints: Stephen N. Thibodeau, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, 920 Hilton Building, Rochester, MN 55905. Phone: 507-284-4696; Fax: 507-284-0670. E-mail: sthibodeau{at}mayo.edu

The frequency of colorectal cancer (CRC) among the Alaska Native people is the highest of any ethnic group in the United States. In this study, CRC from 329 Alaska Native people (165 Eskimo, 111 Indians, and 53 Aleut) were evaluated for evidence of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) by testing tumors for altered protein expression (hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6) and for the presence of microsatellite instability. Of the 329 samples tested, 46 (14%) showed both microsatellite instability and altered protein expression; 42 (91%) with a loss of hMLH1, 3 (7%) hMSH2, and 1 (2%) hMLH1/hMSH6. Tumors with loss of hMLH1 were further evaluated for hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation and for the presence of the BRAF-V600E mutation. Among cases tested, all 19 (100%) tumors among the Eskimo patients showed hMLH1 promoter hypermethylation, whereas this was the case for only 3 of the 7 (42%) tumors among the Aleut (P = 0.002) and 5 of the 10 (50%) tumors from the Indians (P = 0.002). The majority of hypermethylated cases (23 of 27) tested positive for the V600E alteration. Of the nine tumors from the Aleut and Indian patients that did not exhibit hMLH1 hypermethylation, eight tested negative for V600E. Overall, the frequency of defective MMR among the three groups was not statistically different (P = 0.75). However, the data suggest that the pathogenesis of CRC may differ between the three groups. The CRC with defective MMR among the Eskimo sample fit the typical profile for hMLH1-related cancer associated with sporadic CRC, whereas the pattern in the Aleut and Indian suggests the possibility that germ line hMLH1 mutations may be present. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(11):2344–50)