| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; 2 Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire; 3 Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 4 University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii; 5 University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; 6 Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina; 7 University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia; 8 McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; 9 Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and 10 National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Requests for reprints: Polly Newcomb, Cancer Prevention Research Program, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, P.O. Box 10924, M4-B402, Seattle, WA 98109-1024. Phone: 206-667-3476; Fax: 206-667-7850. E-mail: pnewcomb{at}fhcrc.org
Background: Family studies have served as a cornerstone of genetic research on colorectal cancer.
Materials and Methods: The Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (Colon CFR) is an international consortium of six centers in North America and Australia formed as a resource to support studies on the etiology, prevention, and clinical management of colorectal cancer. Differences in design and sampling schemes ensures a resource that covers the continuum of disease risk. Two separate recruitment strategies identified colorectal cancer cases: population-based (incident case probands identified by cancer registries; all six centers) and clinic-based (families with multiple cases of colorectal cancer presenting at cancer family clinics; three centers). At this time, the Colon CFR is in year 10 with the second phase of enrollment nearly complete. In phase I recruitment (1998-2002), population-based sampling ranged from all incident cases of colorectal cancer to a subsample based on age at diagnosis and/or family cancer history. During phase II (2002-2007), population-based recruitment targeted cases diagnosed before the age of 50 years are more likely attributable to genetic factors. Standardized protocols were used to collect information regarding family cancer history and colorectal cancer risk factors, and biospecimens were obtained to assess microsatellite instability (MSI) status, expression of mismatch repair proteins, and other molecular and genetic processes.
Results: Of the 8,369 case probands enrolled to date, 2,602 reported having one or more colorectal cancer–affected relatives and 799 met the Amsterdam I criteria for Lynch syndrome. A large number of affected (1,324) and unaffected (19,816) relatives were enrolled, as were population-based (4,108) and spouse (983) controls. To date, 91% of case probands provided blood (or, for a few, buccal cell) samples and 75% provided tumor tissue. For a selected sample of high-risk subjects, lymphocytes have been immortalized. Nearly 600 case probands had more than two affected colorectal cancer relatives, and 800 meeting the Amsterdam I criteria and 128, the Amsterdam II criteria. MSI testing for 10 markers was attempted on all obtained tumors. Of the 4,011 tumors collected in phase I that were successfully tested, 16% were MSI-high, 12% were MSI-low, and 72% were microsatellite stable. Tumor tissues from clinic-based cases were twice as likely as population-based cases to be MSI-high (34% versus 17%). Seventeen percent of phase I proband tumors and 24% of phase II proband tumors had some loss of mismatch repair protein, with the prevalence depending on sampling. Active follow-up to update personal and family histories, new neoplasms, and deaths in probands and relatives is nearly complete.
Conclusions: The Colon CFR supports an evolving research program that is broad and interdisciplinary. The greater scientific community has access to this large and well-characterized resource for studies of colorectal cancer. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(11):2331–43)
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
