CEBP Grants Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 16, 23, January 1, 2007. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0755
© 2007 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaaks, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rinaldi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kaaks, R.

Endogenous Androgens and Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

Sabina Rinaldi1, Laure Dossus1,2, Annekatrin Lukanova2,3, Petra H.M. Peeters4, Naomi E. Allen5, Timothy Key5, Sheila Bingham6, Kay-Tee Khaw7, Dimitrios Trichopoulos8, Antonia Trichopoulou8, Eleni Oikonomou8, Guillem Pera9, Nerea Larrañaga10, Carmen Martinez-Garcia11, Eva Ardanaz12, J. Ramón Quirós13, María-José Tormo14, Anne Tjønneland15, Anja Olsen15, Kim Overvad16, Jenny Chang-Claude2, Jakob Linseisen2, Mandy Schulz17, Heiner Boeing17, Carla H. van Gils4, Bas H. Bueno-de-Mesquita18, Valeria Pala19, Domenico Palli20, Salvatore Panico21, Rosario Tumino22, Paolo Vineis23, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon25, Sylvie Mesrine25, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault25, Eva Lundin26, Åsa Ågren27, Göran Berglund28, Jonas Manjer29, Merethe Kumle30, Eiliv Lund30, Nadia Slimani1, Rodolfo Saracci1, Elio Riboli24 and Rudolf Kaaks1,2

1 IARC, Lyon, France; 2 German Cancer Research Centre, Clinical Epidemiology, Heidelberg, Germany; 3 New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; 4 Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 5 Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; 6 Medical Research Council Centre for Nutrition in Cancer Prevention and Survival, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge; 7 Clinical Gerontology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 8 Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Athens, Greece; 9 Epidemiology Department, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain; 10 Public Health Division of Gipuzkoa, Health Department of the Basque Country, Donostia-San Sebastian, Spain; 11 Andalusian School of Public Health, Granada, Spain; 12 Public Health Institute of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; 13 Public Health and Health Planning Directorate, Asturias, Spain; 14 Consejería de Sanida, Murcia, Spain; 15 Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark; 16 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 17 Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition, Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Germany; 18 Centre for Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands; 19 Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy; 20 Molecular and Nutritional Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Center, Scientific Institute of Tuscany, Florence, Italy; 21 Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università Federico II, Naples, Italy; 22 Cancer Registry, Azienda Ospedaliera "Civile M.P. Arezzo," Ragusa, Italy; 23 Environmental Epidemiology and 24 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; 25 Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France; Departments of 26 Medical Biosciences/Pathology and 27 Public Health and Clinical Medicine, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden; Departments of 28 Clinical Sciences and 29 Surgery, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; and 30 Institute of Community Medicine, University of Tromso, Tromso, Norway

Requests for reprints: Rudolf Kaaks, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany. Phone: 49-6221-422385; Fax: 49-6221-422203. E-mail: r.kaaks{at}dkfz.de

Few epidemiologic studies have examined the hypothesis that circulating androgens are involved in the development of ovarian cancer. We investigated the association between prediagnostic serum levels of androgens and sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG) and ovarian cancer risk in a case-control study nested within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort. One hundred and ninety-two ovarian cancer cases and 346 matched controls not using exogenous hormones at baseline blood donation were eligible for the study. Serum levels of testosterone, androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, and SHBG were measured by direct immunoassays. Free testosterone (fT) was calculated according to mass action laws. Multivariate conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios adjusted for possible confounders. Overall, there was no association between serum concentrations of androgens or SHBG and ovarian cancer risk. In postmenopausal women, fT concentrations were inversely related to risk [highest versus lowest tertile odds ratio 0.45 (0.24-0.86); Ptrend = 0.01]. Among women diagnosed before the age of 55 years, there was a negative association with SHBG and a positive association with fT and ovarian cancer risk, although these associations were not statistically significant. The present study suggests that circulating androgens and SHBG levels are not strongly associated with ovarian cancer risk, although levels of fT may be associated with an increased risk among women diagnosed at relatively young age. The heterogeneity of results on the associations of fT with ovarian cancer risk in postmenopausal women deserves further investigation. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(1):23–9)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
C. M Olsen, A. C Green, C. M Nagle, S. J Jordan, D. C Whiteman, C. J Bain, P. M Webb, and on behalf of the Australian Cancer Study Group (Ov
Epithelial ovarian cancer: testing the 'androgens hypothesis'
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2008; 15(4): 1061 - 1068.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. S. Tworoger, I-M. Lee, J. E. Buring, and S. E. Hankinson
Plasma Androgen Concentrations and Risk of Incident Ovarian Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2008; 167(2): 211 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Association for Cancer Research.