This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Locke, I. Articles by Eeles, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Locke, I. Articles by Eeles, R. A.

Loss of Heterozygosity at the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Loci Detected in Ductal Lavage Fluid from BRCA Gene Mutation Carriers and Controls

¹ The Institute of Cancer Research; ² The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; and ³ Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

Requests for reprints: Imogen Locke, Department of Cancer Genetics, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Orchard House, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-20-8661-3105; Fax: 44-20-8770-1489. E-mail: imogen.locke{at}icr.ac.uk

Female BRCA gene mutation carriers are at increased risk for developing breast cancer. Ductal lavage is a novel method for sampling breast ductal fluid, providing epithelial cells for cytologic assessment and a source of free DNA for molecular analyses. Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the BRCA loci in ductal lavage fluid is a potential biomarker of breast cancer risk. The LOH rate was measured at the BRCA1/2 loci and compared with that at a control locus (APC) using free DNA from the ductal lavage fluid of BRCA carriers and predictive test negative controls. We evaluated the reproducibility of these analyses. Free DNA sufficient for PCR amplification was obtained from 33 ductal lavage samples of 17 healthy women of known BRCA status (14 BRCA carriers and 3 controls). LOH rates of 36.4% to 56.3% at the BRCA1 locus and 45% to 61.5% at the BRCA2 locus were found among BRCA carriers. The LOH rate at the APC locus was lower (18.5%). The interaliquot reproducibility for the D17S855 marker of the BRCA1 locus was 66.7%. Intraaliquot reproducibility was 90%. Although we successfully isolated sufficient free DNA from ductal lavage fluid for PCR amplification, the degree of reproducibility of these LOH studies raises questions about the robustness of this technique as a risk assessment tool in the evaluation of high-risk women. Further studies are required to evaluate the specificity and predictive value of LOH in ductal lavage fluid for breast cancer development. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(7):1399–402)