
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cancer Research Center of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China; 2 Department of Genetics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai; 3 State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; 4 Institute of Occupational Medicine, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China; and 5 Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
Requests for reprints: Hongbing Shen, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Cancer Research Center of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China. Phone: 86-25-8686-2756; Fax: 86-25-8652-7613. E-mail: hbshen{at}njmu.edu.cnCo-correspondence to: Wei Huang, Department of Genetics, Chinese National Human Genome Center at Shanghai, Shanghai 201203, China. E-mail: huangwei{at}chgc.sh.cn
The transcription factor IIH (TFIIH) helicases ERCC2/XPD and ERCC3/XPB are responsible for opening the DNA strand around the lesion site during nucleotide excision repair process. Genetic variants in these two genes may be markers for interindividual variability in DNA repair capacity and thus predisposition to cancer risk. In this case-control study of 1,010 incident lung cancer cases and 1,011 age and sex frequencymatched cancer-free controls in a Chinese population, we genotyped eight tagging polymorphisms of ERCC2 and ERCC3 using the high-throughput Taqman platform to determine their associations with risk of lung cancer. Although none of the eight polymorphisms was individually associated with lung cancer risk, we found that genetic variants in ERCC2 and ERCC3 jointly contributed to lung cancer risk in a dose-response manner. Compared with those with 0 to 1 "at-risk" locus, subjects carrying >1 at-risk loci were at increased risk for lung cancer [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 1.29; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.98-1.70 for 2 at-risk loci; adjusted OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.02-1.85 for 3 at-risk loci; and adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09-2.10 for
4 at-risk loci, respectively; Ptrend = 0.015]. This combined effect was slightly more evident in young subjects (<60 years), males, current smokers, and those with family history of cancer, particularly for histologic type of adenocarcinomas. No evidence for interaction was found. These findings indicate that these tagSNPs of the ERCC2 and ERCC3 along with their surrounding regions may serve as biomarkers of susceptibility to lung cancer, which warrant further validation by other population-based and phenotypic studies to determine the biological relevance of these tagSNPs. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(7):133640)
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Hopkins, D. W. Cescon, D. Tse, P. Bradbury, W. Xu, C. Ma, P. Wheatley-Price, J. Waldron, D. Goldstein, F. Meyer, et al. Genetic Polymorphisms and Head and Neck Cancer Outcomes: A Review Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 490 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |