This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bray, F. Articles by Møller, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bray, F. Articles by Møller, H.

Do Testicular Seminoma and Nonseminoma Share the Same Etiology? Evidence from an Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Incidence Trends in Eight European Countries

¹ Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway; ² London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; ³ Thames Cancer Registry, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; ⁴ IARC, Lyon, France; ⁵ CeRMS and Center for Oncologic Prevention, University of Turin, Italy; ⁶ Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; ⁷ Northern and Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; ⁸ Finnish Cancer Registry, Helsinki, Finland; and ⁹ Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia

Requests for reprints: Freddie Bray, Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Research, Montebello, N-0310 Oslo, Norway. Phone: 47-22-45-13-34; E-mail: freddie.bray{at}kreftregisteret.no.

The incidence of the two main clinical subentities of testicular germ cell cancer (seminoma and nonseminoma) is increasing throughout Europe. Most studies have revealed little variation in risk factors between the two subtypes. This study compared generation-specific trends in eight European countries, hypothesizing that similar temporal pattern by birth cohort implied that seminoma and nonseminoma had a largely comparable etiology. The results are presented using the age-period-cohort model and the nonidentifiability problem highlighted by partitioning the age, period, and cohort effects in terms of their linear and curvature component parts, assuming a priori that cohort effects predominated. Despite uniform overall increases by calendar period, declining rates of nonseminoma but not pure seminoma were observed in the majority of countries during the 1990s. The subtype trends were, however, largely analogous on a birth cohort scale. Notable observations were a decline in rates of both subtypes among recent birth cohorts in Switzerland and a short-term wartime effect in several countries, involving an attenuation of increasing risk of both subtypes in men born in 1940 to 1945. Departures from the steady increases in testicular cancer over time were likely to occur for nonseminomas some years ahead of seminoma on a period scale. The importance of birth cohort coincided with the view that given a short time interval of susceptibility to exposures earlier in life and a biologically constant time to diagnosis, all temporal changes in rate-limiting exposures should appear as generational effects. Trends in seminoma and nonseminoma conform to largely the same temporal patterns on this scale, implying that they share important etiologic factors. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(4):652–8)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Stang and K.-H. Jockel Etiologic conclusions from similar birth cohort effects. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1752 - 1752. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Bray, L. Richiardi, A. Ekbom, D. Forman, E. Pukkala, M. Cuninkova, and H. Moller Etiologic conclusions from similar birth cohort effects. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2006; 15(9): 1752 - 1752. [Full Text] [PDF]