CEBP Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Leitzmann, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Leitzmann, M. F.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 15, 334-341, February 2006
© 2006 American Association for Cancer Research

Association of Energy Intake and Energy Balance with Postmenopausal Breast Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial

Shih-Chen Chang1, Regina G. Ziegler1, Barbara Dunn2, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon1, James V. Lacey, Jr.1, Wen-Yi Huang1, Arthur Schatzkin1, Douglas Reding3, Robert N. Hoover1, Patricia Hartge1 and Michael F. Leitzmann1

Divisions of 1 Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics and 2 Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland and 3 Marshfield Medical Research and Education Foundation, Marshfield, Minnesota

Requests for reprints: Shih-Chen Chang, Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza South, Suite 320, MSC7232, Bethesda, MD 20892-7232. Phone: 301-594-7640; Fax: 301-496-6829. E-mail: changshi{at}mail.nih.gov

Energy restriction remains one of the most effective ways known to prevent breast cancer in animal models. However, energy intake has not been consistently associated with risk of breast cancer in humans. In a prospective study, we assessed whether energy intake, body size, and physical activity each independently influence breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women and estimated the joint effect of combinations of these individual factors. As part of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial, 38,660 women, ages 55 to 74 years and recruited from 10 centers in the United States during 1993 to 2001, were randomized to the screening arm of the trial. At baseline, the women completed a self-administered questionnaire, including a food frequency questionnaire. During follow-up from 1993 to 2003, 764 incident breast cancer cases were ascertained. Women in the highest quartile of energy intake (≥2,084 kcal/d) compared with those in the lowest quartile (<1,316 kcal/d) had a significantly increased risk for breast cancer [multivariate relative risk (RR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.02-1.53; Ptrend continuous = 0.03]. Current body mass index (BMI) was also positively and significantly associated with risk (multivariate RR comparing >30 kg/m2 with <22.5 kg/m2, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.06-1.70; Ptrend = 0.01). Women with ≥4 hours/wk of vigorous recreational physical activity had a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer compared with those who reported no recreational physical activity (multivariate RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99; Ptrend = 0.15). None of these associations with individual energy balance measures was substantially confounded by the other two measures. When we estimated the joint effect of all three variables, women with the most unfavorable energy balance (the highest energy intake, highest BMI, and least physical activity) had twice the risk (RR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.27-3.45) of women with the most favorable energy balance (the lowest energy intake, lowest BMI, and most physical activity). Although our estimates of absolute energy intake, based on a food frequency questionnaire, are imperfect, these results suggest that energy intake, in addition to BMI and physical activity may be independently associated with breast cancer risk. In addition, these three aspects of energy balance may act jointly in determining breast cancer risk. (Cancer Epidemiol Prev 2006;15(2):334–41)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. Ahn, A. Schatzkin, J. V. Lacey Jr, D. Albanes, R. Ballard-Barbash, K. F. Adams, V. Kipnis, T. Mouw, A. R. Hollenbeck, and M. F. Leitzmann
Adiposity, Adult Weight Change, and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Risk
Arch Intern Med, October 22, 2007; 167(19): 2091 - 2102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. Kopelovich, J. R. Fay, C. C. Sigman, and J. A. Crowell
The Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway as a Potential Target for Cancer Chemoprevention
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2007; 16(7): 1330 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Schottenfeld and J. Beebe-Dimmer
Alleviating the Burden of Cancer: A Perspective on Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2049 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2006 by the American Association for Cancer Research.