This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nersesyan, A. Articles by Knasmüller, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nersesyan, A. Articles by Knasmüller, S. Related Collections Oncogenesis Oncogenesis: Biomarkers

Effect of Staining Procedures on the Results of Micronucleus Assays with Exfoliated Oral Mucosa Cells

¹ Institute of Cancer Research, Internal Medicine I and ² Institute of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Requests for reprints: Siegfried Knasmüller, Institute of Cancer Research, Inner Medicine I, Medical University Vienna, Borschkegasse 8a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. Phone 43-1-427765142; Fax: 43-1-42779651; E-mail: siegfried.knasmueller{at}meduniwien.ac.at

Micronuclei in exfoliated epithelial cells are widely used as biomarkers of cancer risk in humans. To elucidate the effect of different staining procedures on the outcome of such investigation, we conducted a study in which the micronuclei frequencies in oral mucosa cells of heavy smokers (n = 20) and nonsmokers (n = 10) were evaluated with nonspecific (Giemsa, May-Grünwald-Giemsa) and DNA-specific (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Feulgen, acridine orange) stains, whereas with Giemsa-based stains, the frequencies of micronuclei in smokers were significantly (4- to 5-fold) higher in the smokers group, no significant increase was observed with any of the DNA-specific stains. Furthermore, the evaluation of cells of the two study groups with Feulgen stain showed that oral mucosa cells from smokers had significantly increased levels of nuclear anomalies other than micronuclei. These anomalies are consequences of cell injury found in epithelial cells and are paralleled by formation of keratin bodies in the cytoplasm that resemble micronuclei. Correlation analyses showed that micronuclei frequencies scored in Giemsa-stained slides correlated significantly with karyorrhexis, karyolysis, condensed chromatin, and binucleates, whereas no such correlations were found with DNA-specific stains. These findings indicate that nuclear anomalies (and possibly keratin bodies) may be misinterpreted as micronuclei with nonspecific DNA stains and lead to false-positive results in studies with cells of epithelial origin. Furthermore, our results show that exposure of oral mucosa cells to genotoxic carcinogens contained in tobacco smoke does not lead to induction of micronuclei in these cells. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(10):1835–40)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Bonassi, B. Biasotti, M. Kirsch-Volders, S. Knasmueller, E. Zeiger, S. Burgaz, C. Bolognesi, N. Holland, P. Thomas, M. Fenech, et al. State of the art survey of the buccal micronucleus assay--a first stage in the HUMNXL project initiative Mutagenesis, July 1, 2009; 24(4): 295 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Fenech, C. Bolognesi, M. Kirsch-Volders, S. Bonassi, E. Zeiger, S. Knasmuller, and N. Holland Harmonisation of the micronucleus assay in human buccal cells--a Human Micronucleus (HUMN) project (www.humn.org) initiative commencing in 2007 Mutagenesis, January 1, 2007; 22(1): 3 - 4. [Full Text] [PDF]