| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
Requests for reprints: Sarah J. Lewis, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, United Kingdom. Phone: 440-117-928-7266; Fax: 440-117-928-7325. E-mail: s.j.lewis{at}bristol.ac.uk
Mendelian randomization, the use of common polymorphisms as surrogates for measuring exposure levels in epidemiologic studies, provides one method of assessing the causal nature of some environmental exposures. This can be illustrated by looking at the association between the ALDH2 polymorphism and esophageal cancer. Alcohol drinking is considered a risk factor for esophageal cancer, and exposure to high levels of acetaldehyde, the principal metabolite of alcohol, may be responsible for the increased cancer risk. The ability to metabolize acetaldehyde is encoded by the ALDH2 gene, which is polymorphic in some populations. The ALDH2*2 allele produces an inactive protein subunit, which is unable to metabolize acetaldehyde. An individual's genotype at this locus may influence their esophageal cancer risk through two mechanisms, first through influencing alcohol intake and second through influencing acetaldehyde levels. We have carried out a meta-analysis of studies looking at the ALDH2 genotype and esophageal cancer and found that risk was reduced among *2*2 homozygotes [odds ratio (OR), 0.36; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.16-0.80] and increased among heterozygotes (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 1.86-5.47) relative to *1*1 homozygotes. This provides strong evidence that alcohol intake increases the risk of esophageal cancer and individuals whose genotype results in markedly lower intake, because they have an adverse reaction to alcohol are thus protected. This meta-analysis also provides evidence that acetaldehyde plays a carcinogenic role in esophageal cancer. The two different processes operating as a result of the ALDH2 genotype have implications for the interpretation of studies using the Mendelian randomization paradigm.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Schatzkin, C. C. Abnet, A. J. Cross, M. Gunter, R. Pfeiffer, M. Gail, U. Lim, and G. Davey-Smith Mendelian Randomization: How It Can--and Cannot--Help Confirm Causal Relations between Nutrition and Cancer Cancer Prevention Research, February 1, 2009; 2(2): 104 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Boccia, M. Hashibe, P. Galli, E. De Feo, T. Asakage, T. Hashimoto, A. Hiraki, T. Katoh, T. Nomura, A. Yokoyama, et al. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 2 and Head and Neck Cancer: A Meta-analysis Implementing a Mendelian Randomization Approach Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 248 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. M. Dong, J. D. Potter, E. White, C. M. Ulrich, L. R. Cardon, and U. Peters Genetic Susceptibility to Cancer: The Role of Polymorphisms in Candidate Genes JAMA, May 28, 2008; 299(20): 2423 - 2436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. D. Smith and S. Ebrahim Reply Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 416 - 417. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Fraser, R. Harris, N. Sattar, S. Ebrahim, G. D. Smith, and D.A. Lawlor Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Is Associated With Incident Vascular Events Independently of Alcohol Intake: Analysis of the British Women's Heart and Health Study and Meta-Analysis Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 27(12): 2729 - 2735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. D. Smith Capitalizing on Mendelian randomization to assess the effects of treatments J R Soc Med, September 1, 2007; 100(9): 432 - 435. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Jiang, G N. Thomas, T. H. Lam, C M. Schooling, W. Zhang, X. Lao, P. Adab, B. Liu, G. M Leung, and K. K. Cheng Cohort Profile: The Guangzhou Biobank Cohort Study, a Guangzhou-Hong Kong-Birmingham collaboration Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2006; 35(4): 844 - 852. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. D. Smith, M. Gwinn, S. Ebrahim, L. J Palmer, and M. J Khoury Make it HuGE: human genome epidemiology reviews, population health, and the IJE Int. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2006; 35(3): 507 - 510. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. D. Smith Randomised by (your) god: robust inference from an observational study design J Epidemiol Community Health, May 1, 2006; 60(5): 382 - 388. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |
