This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kavanagh, A. M. Articles by Hopper, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kavanagh, A. M. Articles by Hopper, J. L.

Hormone Replacement Therapy, Percent Mammographic Density, and Sensitivity of Mammography

¹ Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University; ² St. Vincent's BreastScreen, St. Vincent's Hospital and ³ Centre for Genetic Epidemiology Centre, Department of Public Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia and ⁴ Cancer Epidemiology Centre, the Cancer Council of Victoria, Carlton, Victoria, Australia

Requests for reprints: Anne M. Kavanagh, Key Centre for Women's Health in Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010. Phone: 61-3-8344-7394; Fax: 61-3-9347-9824. E-mail: a.kavanagh{at}unimelb.edu.au

Objective: We examine to what extent the lower mammographic sensitivity found in hormone replacement therapy (HRT) users can be explained by any association of HRT use with higher mammographic density and more difficult to detect cancers.

Methods: We used logistic regression to estimate the odds of a false-negative screen (a breast cancer diagnosed in the 24 months after a negative screening examination) for HRT users and to estimate, and adjust for, mammographic density (measured on a continuous scale, blinded, using a reliable, computer-assisted method), tumor characteristics (size, grade, and morphology), and potential confounders (age, symptom status, family history, and prior screening) among women ages 55 years who attended BreastScreen Victoria for first round screening mammography in 1994 and 1995 (1,086 breast cancers) and for subsequent round screening (471 breast cancers) in 1995 and 1996.

Results: After adjusting for confounders, HRT users were more likely to have a false-negative screen [first round: odds ratio (OR), 1.99; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.4-2.9; subsequent round: OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.4-3.8]. This effect was modestly attenuated by adjusting for mammographic density (first round: OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.0-2.3; subsequent round: OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.2-3.3). Adjusting for tumor characteristics resulted in a modest increase in the odds of a false negative at first round but had no effect at subsequent round.

Conclusions: Mammographic density only partly explains the effect of HRT on sensitivity. Further research needs to clarify whether hyperemic breast tissue changes affect cancer detectability in HRT users as well as the possibility that the quality of mammography may be poor in some HRT users.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. J. A. Bowles, D. L. Miglioretti, E. A. Sickles, L. Abraham, P. A. Carney, B. C. Yankaskas, and J. G. Elmore Accuracy of Short-Interval Follow-Up Mammograms by Patient and Radiologist Characteristics Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2008; 190(5): 1200 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Vaidya Re: Declines in Invasive Breast Cancer and Use of Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy in a Screening Mammography Population J Natl Cancer Inst, April 16, 2008; 100(8): 598 - 599. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. M. Chiarelli, V. A. Kirsh, N. S. Klar, R. Shumak, R. Jong, E. Fishell, M. J. Yaffe, and N. F. Boyd Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2006; 15(10): 1856 - 1862. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]