CEBP Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aiello, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, P. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aiello, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Porter, P. L.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 14, 662-668, March 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Association between Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Tumor Characteristics

Erin J. Aiello1, Diana S.M. Buist1,2, Emily White2,3 and Peggy L. Porter3,4

1 Group Health Cooperative, Center for Health Studies; 2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington; 3 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, and 4 Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington;

Requests for reprints: Erin J. Aiello, Group Health Cooperative, Center for Health Studies, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101. Phone: 206-287-2708; Fax: 206-287-2485. E-mail: aiello.e{at}ghc.org

Objective: Few studies have examined the association between breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics. We examined the association between hormonal, proliferative, and histologic tumor characteristics and mammographic breast density in women with breast cancer.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in 546 women diagnosed with invasive breast cancer to evaluate the associations between breast density and tumor size, lymph node status, lymphatic or vascular invasion, histologic grade, nuclear grade, tumor differentiation, mitotic index, tumor necrosis, Ki-67 proliferation, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, p53, p27, cyclin E, Bcl-2, and C-erb-B2 invasion. Breast density was classified as fatty (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System code 1 or 2; n = 373) or dense (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System code 3 or 4; n = 173) for the cancer-free breast. A single pathologist measured all tumor markers. We examined whether the relationships were modified by interval cancer or screen-detected cancer.

Results: Women with a tumor size >1.0 cm were more likely to have dense breasts compared with women with a tumor size ≤1.0 cm after adjusting for confounders (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.4 for tumor sizes 1.1-2.0 cm; odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-4.4 for tumor sizes 2.1-10 cm). Tumor size, lymph node status, and lymphatic or vascular invasion were positively associated with breast density among screen-detected cancers. Histologic grade and mitotic index were negatively associated with breast density in women diagnosed with an interval cancer.

Conclusions: These results suggest that breast density is related to tumor size, lymph node status, and lymphatic or vascular invasion in screen-detected cancers. Additional studies are needed to address whether these associations are due to density masking the detection of some tumors, a biological relationship, or both.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. Ghosh, K. R. Brandt, T. A. Sellers, C. Reynolds, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, M. J. Carston, V. S. Pankratz, and C. M. Vachon
Association of Mammographic Density with the Pathology of Subsequent Breast Cancer among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 872 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Sellers, C. Vachon, V. Pankratz, C. Janney, Z Fredericksen, K. Brandt, Y Huang, F. Couch, L. Kushi, and J. Cerhan
Association of Childhood and Adolescent Anthropometric Factors, Physical Activity, and Diet with Adult Mammographic Breast Density
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2007; 166(4): 456 - 464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. L. Irwin, E. J. Aiello, A. McTiernan, L. Bernstein, F. D. Gilliland, R. N. Baumgartner, K. B. Baumgartner, and R. Ballard-Barbash
Physical Activity, Body Mass Index, and Mammographic Density in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2007; 25(9): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. J. R. Porter, A. J. Evans, E. J. Cornford, H. C. Burrell, J. J. James, A. H. S. Lee, and J. Chakrabarti
Influence of Mammographic Parenchymal Pattern in Screening-Detected and Interval Invasive Breast Cancers on Pathologic Features, Mammographic Features, and Patient Survival
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2007; 188(3): 676 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.