CEBP Meeting Calendar Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haars, G.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, P. H.M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Haars, G.
Right arrow Articles by Peeters, P. H.M.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 14, 2634-2640, November 2005
© 2005 American Association for Cancer Research

Measurements of Breast Density: No Ratio for a Ratio

Gerco Haars, Paulus A.H. van Noord, Carla H. van Gils, Diederick E. Grobbee and Petra H.M. Peeters

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht, the Netherlands

Requests for reprints: Gerco Haars, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Stratenum, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands. Phone: 31-30-253-8097; Fax: 31-30-253-9028. E-mail: G.Haars{at}umcutrecht.nl

Breast density, as visible on mammograms, is generally assessed as the occupied percentage of the breast and is a risk factor for breast cancer. Various studies have looked into the causation and alteration of relative density but the relation of a determinant with a relative measure does not allow a direct etiologic interpretation. It was our goal to compare the effects of known determinants on relative density and the absolute amounts of dense and nondense tissues. We measured the absolute and relative densities in a population of 418 postmenopausal women participating in a breast cancer screening program. The occupied surface area was calculated after manually tracing the contours of the tissues on digitized mammograms. Information on determinants was available through physical examination and questionnaires. Data were analyzed by multivariate linear regression. Age and parity were found to decrease the amount of dense tissue and the ages at menarche and menopause were found to increase it (R2 = 13%). The amount of nondense tissue was increased by higher body mass index (BMI), age, and parity (R2 = 43%). Relative density was affected by a combination of these factors (R2 = 29%) with directionalities of effects that are comparable to those of dense tissue. However, the magnitudes of these effects were the resultant of the effects on dense and nondense tissues. The influence of BMI on relative density was completely due to an effect on nondense tissue. Although relative density is a relevant prognostic factor, inferences about the etiology of breast density should be made on the basis of absolute measures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Douglas, M.-H. Roy-Gagnon, C. Zhou, B. D. Mitchell, A. R. Shuldiner, H.-P. Chan, and M. A. Helvie
Mammographic Breast Density--Evidence for Genetic Correlations with Established Breast Cancer Risk Factors
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2008; 17(12): 3509 - 3516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Verheus, C. H. van Gils, S. Kreijkamp-Kaspers, L. Kok, P. H.M. Peeters, D. E. Grobbee, and Y. T. van der Schouw
Soy Protein Containing Isoflavones and Mammographic Density in a Randomized Controlled Trial in Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2632 - 2638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. Ghosh, K. R. Brandt, T. A. Sellers, C. Reynolds, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, M. J. Carston, V. S. Pankratz, and C. M. Vachon
Association of Mammographic Density with the Pathology of Subsequent Breast Cancer among Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2008; 17(4): 872 - 879.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Stuedal, H. Ma, L. Bernstein, M. C. Pike, and G. Ursin
Does Breast Size Modify the Association between Mammographic Density and Breast Cancer Risk?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2008; 17(3): 621 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. M. Peters, U. Ekelund, M. Leitzmann, D. Easton, R. Warren, R. Luben, S. Bingham, K.-T. Khaw, and N. J. Wareham
Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density in the EPIC-Norfolk Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2008; 167(5): 579 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. J. Fuhrman, B. E. Teter, M. Barba, C. Byrne, A. Cavalleri, B. J. Grant, P. J. Horvath, D. Morelli, E. Venturelli, and P. C. Muti
Equol Status Modifies the Association of Soy Intake and Mammographic Density in a Sample of Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2008; 17(1): 33 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. M. Vachon, T. A. Sellers, E. E. Carlson, J. M. Cunningham, C. A. Hilker, R. L. Smalley, D. J. Schaid, L. E. Kelemen, F. J. Couch, and V. S. Pankratz
Strong Evidence of a Genetic Determinant for Mammographic Density, a Major Risk Factor for Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 67(17): 8412 - 8418.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
K. W. Reeves, G. L. Gierach, and F. Modugno
Recreational Physical Activity and Mammographic Breast Density Characteristics
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 934 - 942.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Verheus, P. H.M. Peeters, R. Kaaks, P. A.H. van Noord, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Premenopausal Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Serum Levels and Changes in Breast Density over Menopause
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 451 - 457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. M. Vachon, K. R. Brandt, K. Ghosh, C. G. Scott, S. D. Maloney, M. J. Carston, V. S. Pankratz, and T. A. Sellers
Mammographic Breast Density as a General Marker of Breast Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2007; 16(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. Maskarinec, I. Pagano, G. Lurie, and L. N. Kolonel
A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2006; 15(4): 732 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
F. J.B. van Duijnhoven, P. H.M. Peeters, R. M.L. Warren, S. A. Bingham, A. G. Uitterlinden, P. A.H. van Noord, E. M. Monninkhof, D. E. Grobbee, and C. H. van Gils
Influence of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and Progesterone Receptor Polymorphisms on the Effects of Hormone Therapy on Mammographic Density.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 462 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2005 by the American Association for Cancer Research.