
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York; 2 Occupational Health Program, Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health; and 3 Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Requests for reprints: Sally W. Thurston, Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, University of Rochester, 601 Elmwood Avenue, Box 630, Rochester, NY 14642. Phone: 585-275-2406; Fax: 585-273-1031. E-mail: thurston{at}bst.rochester.edu
Many approaches have been taken to adjust for smoking in modeling cancer risk. In case-control studies, these metrics are often used arbitrarily rather than being based on the properties of the metric in the context of the study. Depending on the underlying study design, hypotheses, and base population, different metrics may be deemed most appropriate. We present our approach to evaluating different smoking metrics. We examine the properties of a new metric, "logcig-years", that we initially derived from using a biological model of DNA adduct formation. We compare this metric to three other smoking metrics, namely pack-years, square-root pack-years, and a model in which smoking duration and intensity are separate variables. Our comparisons use generalized additive models and logistic regression to examine the relationship between the logit probability of cancer and each of the metrics, adjusting for other covariates. All models were fit using data from a lung cancer study of 1,275 cases and 1,269 controls that has focused on gene-smoking relationships. There was a very significant, linear relationship between logcig-years and the logit probability of lung cancer in this sample, without any need to adjust for smoking status. These properties together were not shared by the other metrics. In this sample, logcig-years captured more information about smoking that is important in lung cancer risk than the other metrics. In conclusion, we provide a general framework for evaluating different smoking metrics in studies where smoking is a critical variable.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Beane, P. Sebastiani, T. H. Whitfield, K. Steiling, Y.-M. Dumas, M. E. Lenburg, and A. Spira A Prediction Model for Lung Cancer Diagnosis that Integrates Genomic and Clinical Features Cancer Prevention Research, June 1, 2008; 1(1): 56 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Sequist, R. G. Martins, D. Spigel, S. M. Grunberg, A. Spira, P. A. Janne, V. A. Joshi, D. McCollum, T. L. Evans, A. Muzikansky, et al. First-Line Gefitinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Somatic EGFR Mutations J. Clin. Oncol., May 20, 2008; 26(15): 2442 - 2449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Finberg, L. V. Sequist, V. A. Joshi, A. Muzikansky, J. M. Miller, M. Han, J. Beheshti, L. R. Chirieac, E. J. Mark, and A. J. Iafrate Mucinous Differentiation Correlates with Absence of EGFR Mutation and Presence of KRAS Mutation in Lung Adenocarcinomas with Bronchioloalveolar Features J. Mol. Diagn., July 1, 2007; 9(3): 320 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Engels, X. Wu, J. Gu, Q. Dong, J. Liu, and M. R. Spitz Systematic Evaluation of Genetic Variants in the Inflammation Pathway and Risk of Lung Cancer Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6520 - 6527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Pankow, K. H. Watanabe, P. L. Toccalino, W. Luo, and D. F. Austin Calculated Cancer Risks for Conventional and "Potentially Reduced Exposure Product" Cigarettes Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 584 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Bates, A. Khalakdina, M. Pai, L. Chang, F. Lessa, and K. R. Smith Risk of Tuberculosis From Exposure to Tobacco Smoke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Arch Intern Med, February 26, 2007; 167(4): 335 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Galeone, E Negri, C Pelucchi, C La Vecchia, C Bosetti, and J Hu Dietary intake of fruit and vegetable and lung cancer risk: a case-control study in Harbin, northeast China Ann. Onc., February 1, 2007; 18(2): 388 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. V. Sequist, V. A. Joshi, P. A. Janne, A. Muzikansky, P. Fidias, M. Meyerson, D. A. Haber, R. Kucherlapati, B. E. Johnson, and T. J. Lynch Response to treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing somatic EGFR mutation testing. Oncologist, January 1, 2007; 12(1): 90 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lubin and N. E. Caporaso Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: modeling total exposure and intensity. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Correction for vol 14, p 2296 Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 3020 - 3020. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Siemiatycki Synthesizing the Lifetime History of Smoking Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2294 - 2295. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |