CEBP Candidate Pathways, Whole Genome Scans: Reconciling Results, Looking into the Future Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sutphen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Krischer, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sutphen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Krischer, J. P.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 13, 1185-1191, July 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Lysophospholipids Are Potential Biomarkers of Ovarian Cancer

Rebecca Sutphen1, Yan Xu4, George D. Wilbanks2, James Fiorica1,2, Edward C. Grendys, Jr.1,2, James P. LaPolla5, Hector Arango6, Mitchell S. Hoffman3, Martin Martino2, Katie Wakeley2,7, David Griffin3, Rafael W. Blanco8, Alan B. Cantor1, Yi-jin Xiao4 and Jeffrey P. Krischer1

Departments of 1 Interdisciplinary Oncology, 2 Obstetrics and Gynecology, and 3 Gynecologic Oncology, College of Medicine and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; 4 Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; 5 Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Bayfront Medical Center, St. Petersburg, Florida; 6 Morton Plant Hospital, Clearwater, Florida; 7 New England Medical Center, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts; and 8 Bay Area Oncology, Tampa, Florida

Requests for reprints: Rebecca Sutphen, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, University of South Florida, 12902 Magnolia Drive, FOW-LCS, Tampa, FL 33612. Phone: 813-903-4990; Fax: 813-558-4807. E-mail: rsutphen{at}hsc.usf.edu

Objective: To determine whether lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and other lysophospholipids (LPL) are useful markers for diagnosis and/or prognosis of ovarian cancer in a controlled setting. Method: Plasma samples were collected from ovarian cancer patients and healthy control women in Hillsborough and Pinellas counties, Florida, and processed at the University of South Florida H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute (Moffitt). Case patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (n = 117) and healthy control subjects (n = 27) participated in the study. Blinded LPL analysis, including 23 individual LPL species, was performed at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation using an electrospray ionization mass spectrometry–based method. LPL levels were transmitted to Moffitt, where clinical data were reviewed and statistical analyses were performed. Results: There were statistically significant differences between preoperative case samples (n = 45) and control samples (n = 27) in the mean levels of total LPA, total lysophosphatidylinositol (LPI), sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), and individual LPA species as well as the combination of several LPL species. The combination of 16:0-LPA and 20:4-LPA yielded the best discrimination between preoperative case samples and control samples, with 93.1% correct classification, 91.1% sensitivity, and 96.3% specificity. In 22 cases with both preoperative and postoperative samples, the postoperative levels of several LPL, including S1P, total LPA, and lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) levels and some individual species of LPA and LPC, were significantly different from preoperative levels. Conclusion: LPA, LPI, LPC, and S1P appear useful as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
Z. Zhao, Y. Xiao, P. Elson, H. Tan, S. J. Plummer, M. Berk, P. P. Aung, I. C. Lavery, J. P. Achkar, L. Li, et al.
Plasma Lysophosphatidylcholine Levels: Potential Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 25(19): 2696 - 2701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
T.-V. Do, J. C. Symowicz, D. M. Berman, L. A. Liotta, E. F. Petricoin III, M. S. Stack, and D. A. Fishman
Lysophosphatidic Acid Down-Regulates Stress Fibers and Up-Regulates Pro-Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Activation in Ovarian Cancer Cells
Mol. Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 5(2): 121 - 131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
F.-q. Wang, Y. Smicun, N. Calluzzo, and D. A. Fishman
Inhibition of Matrilysin Expression by Antisense or RNA Interference Decreases Lysophosphatidic Acid-Induced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Invasion
Mol. Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 4(11): 831 - 841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Ren, Y.-j. Xiao, L. S. Singh, X. Zhao, Z. Zhao, L. Feng, T. M. Rose, G. D. Prestwich, and Y. Xu
Lysophosphatidic Acid is constitutively produced by human peritoneal mesothelial cells and enhances adhesion, migration, and invasion of ovarian cancer cells.
Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3006 - 3014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Lipid Res.Home page
B. W. Parks, G. P. Gambill, A. J. Lusis, and J. H. S. Kabarowski
Loss of G2A promotes macrophage accumulation in atherosclerotic lesions of low density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice
J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1405 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Symowicz, B. P. Adley, M. M.M. Woo, N. Auersperg, L. G. Hudson, and M. S. Stack
Cyclooxygenase-2 Functions as a Downstream Mediator of Lysophosphatidic Acid to Promote Aggressive Behavior in Ovarian Carcinoma Cells
Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 65(6): 2234 - 2242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.