
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California and 2 Department of Epidemiology and Surveillance, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
Requests for reprints: James D. Knoke, Tobacco Control Policies Project, University of California at San Diego, Suite 310, 1545 Hotel Circle South, San Diego, CA 92108. Phone: 619-294-3708; Fax: 619-220-0228. E-mail: jknoke{at}ucsd.edu
Objectives: Models previously developed for predicting lung cancer mortality from cigarette smoking intensity and duration based on aggregated prospective mortality data have employed a study of British doctors and have assumed a uniform age of initiation of smoking. We reexamined these models using the American Cancer Society's Cancer Prevention Study I data that include a range of ages of initiation to assess the importance of an additional term for age. Methods: Model parameters were estimated by maximum likelihood, and model fit was assessed by residual analysis, likelihood ratio tests, and
2 goodness-of-fit tests. Results: Examination of the residuals of a model proposed by Doll and Peto with the Cancer Prevention Study I data suggested that a better fitting model might be obtained by including an additional term specifying the ages when smoking exposure occurred. An extended model with terms for cigarettes smoked per day, duration of smoking, and attained age was found to fit statistically significantly better than the Doll and Peto model (P < 0.001) and to fit well in an absolute sense (goodness-of-fit; P = 0.34). Finally, a model proposed by Moolgavkar was examined and found not to fit as well as the extended model, although it included similar terms (goodness-of-fit; P = 0.007). Conclusions: The addition of age, or another measure of the timing of the exposure to smoking, improves the prediction of lung cancer mortality with Doll and Peto's multiplicative power model.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. K Al-Delaimy, J. P Pierce, K. Messer, M. M White, D. R Trinidad, and E. A Gilpin The California Tobacco Control Program's effect on adult smokers: (2) Daily cigarette consumption levels Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 91 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T Streppel, H. C Boshuizen, M. C Ocke, F. J Kok, and D. Kromhout Mortality and life expectancy in relation to long-term cigarette, cigar and pipe smoking: The Zutphen Study Tob. Control, April 1, 2007; 16(2): 107 - 113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lubin and N. E. Caporaso Cigarette smoking and lung cancer: modeling total exposure and intensity. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2006; 15(3): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. D. Hazelton, M. S. Clements, and S. H. Moolgavkar Multistage Carcinogenesis and Lung Cancer Mortality in Three Cohorts Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1171 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |