
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
1 Fred A. Litwin Centre for Cancer Genetics, 2 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada and Departments of 4 Public Health Sciences and 5 Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Requests for reprints: Hilmi Ozcelik, Fred A. Litwin Centre for Cancer Genetics, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Room 992A, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5. Phone: (416) 586-4996; Fax: (416) 586-8869. E-mail: ozcelik{at}mshri.on.ca
This study investigates the role of two nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in DNA repair genes, X-ray repair cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1)-R399Q and X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3)-T241M, in breast cancer. Incident cases of invasive breast cancer in Caucasian women [n = 402, mean age = 45.7 (SD = 6.2) years] and female Caucasian controls [n = 402, mean age = 45.2 (6.5) years] frequency matched on 5-year age intervals were identified from the Ontario Familial Breast Cancer Registry. No evidence for a main effect of the XRCC1-R399Q genotype on breast cancer risk was observed. Estimates of risk for a family history (FH) of breast cancer compared with no FH differed by XRCC1-R399Q genotype (P value for interaction = 0.001). Homozygote XRCC1-399 R/R individuals and FH+ were at a 2.92-fold [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.475.79] increased risk of disease compared with FH individuals; the estimate of risk increased for R/Q heterozygotes with FH+ [odds ratio (OR) = 3.85, 95% CI = 1.947.65] but not for Q/Q homozygotes with FH+ (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.201.47) compared with homozygous R/R and FH individuals. A marginal positive association for XRCC3-241 M/M compared with T/T genotype was found (OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 0.942.19), but the heterozygous T/M was not associated with an increase in risk (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.711.32). There was also some evidence for a combined effect of body mass index and XRCC3-T241M on estimates of risk. Our results suggest that these polymorphisms may influence breast cancer risk by modifying the effect of risk factors such as FH. There is a need for further study into the role of these polymorphisms as effect modifiers.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Stone, L. C. Gurrin, G. B. Byrnes, C. J. Schroen, S. A. Treloar, E. J.D. Padilla, G. S. Dite, M. C. Southey, V. M. Hayes, and J. L. Hopper Mammographic Density and Candidate Gene Variants: A Twins and Sisters Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2007; 16(7): 1479 - 1484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bhatti, D. M. Church, J. L. Rutter, J. P. Struewing, and A. J. Sigurdson Candidate Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Selection using Publicly Available Tools: A Guide for Epidemiologists Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2006; 164(8): 794 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
The Breast Cancer Association Consortium Commonly studied single-nucleotide polymorphisms and breast cancer: results from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst, October 4, 2006; 98(19): 1382 - 1396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Lindh, S. Rafii, N. Schultz, A. Cox, and T. Helleday Mitotic defects in XRCC3 variants T241M and D213N and their relation to cancer susceptibility Hum. Mol. Genet., April 1, 2006; 15(7): 1217 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. F. Pachkowski, S. Winkel, Y. Kubota, J. A. Swenberg, R. C. Millikan, and J. Nakamura XRCC1 Genotype and Breast Cancer: Functional Studies and Epidemiologic Data Show Interactions between XRCC1 Codon 280 His and Smoking. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 66(5): 2860 - 2868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, P. A. Newcomb, K. M. Egan, L. Titus-Ernstoff, S. Chanock, R. Welch, L. A. Brinton, J. Lissowska, A. Bardin-Mikolajczak, B. Peplonska, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in base-excision repair pathway genes and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 353 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. C. Millikan, J. S. Player, A. R. deCotret, C.-K. Tse, and T. Keku Polymorphisms in DNA Repair Genes, Medical Exposure to Ionizing Radiation, and Breast Cancer Risk Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2326 - 2334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Hu, H. Ma, F. Chen, Q. Wei, and H. Shen XRCC1 Polymorphisms and Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis of 38 Case-Control Studies Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2005; 14(7): 1810 - 1818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Webb, J. L. Hopper, B. Newman, X. Chen, L. Kelemen, G. G. Giles, M. C. Southey, G. Chenevix-Trench, and A. B. Spurdle Double-Strand Break Repair Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Breast or Ovarian Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2005; 14(2): 319 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |