CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Cancer Health Disparities Conference 2009
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taplin, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by White, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taplin, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by White, E.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 13, 225-234, February 2004
© 2004 American Association for Cancer Research

Evaluating Organized Breast Cancer Screening Implementation

The Prevention of Late-Stage Disease?

Stephen H. Taplin1, Laura Ichikawa1, Diana S. M. Buist1,2, Deborah Seger1 and Emily White2,3

1 Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Washington; 2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and 3 Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington

The objective of our study was to evaluate organized breast cancer screening implementation by measuring the association between screening program enrollment and late-stage disease. Our setting was a health plan using mailed mammography reminders to women ages >=40. We conducted yearly cross-sectional summaries of mammography experience and late-stage (regional or distant Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Reporting (SEER) stage) breast cancer occurrence for all of the health-plan women ages >=40 (1986–1998). We estimated the odds of late-stage breast cancer among health-plan and surrounding community women because it was too early to compare changes in mortality. We also estimated the odds of late-stage disease (1995–1998) associated with program enrollment and mammography screening among health-plan women. We found that mammography-within-two-years increased within the health plan from 25.9% to 51.2% among women ages 40–49 and from 32.9% to 74.7% among women ages >=50. Health-plan late-stage rates were lower than those in the surrounding community [ages 40–49: odds ratio (OR), 0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.77–0.99; ages 50–79: OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80–0.92] and declined parallel to the community. Among health-plan cancer cases, women ages >=43 who were enrolled in the screening program and who had at least one program mammogram were less likely to have late-stage disease compared with the women not enrolled in the program (OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16–0.61) but the odds of late-stage was also reduced among program-enrolled women not receiving program mammograms (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.21–0.95). We concluded that enrollment in organized screening is associated with increased likelihood of mammography and reduced odds of late-stage breast cancer. Addressing the concerns of un-enrolled women and those without mammograms offers an opportunity for further late-stage disease reduction.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Taplin, L. Abraham, W. E. Barlow, J. J. Fenton, E. A. Berns, P. A. Carney, G. R. Cutter, E. A. Sickles, D. Carl, and J. G. Elmore
Mammography Facility Characteristics Associated With Interpretive Accuracy of Screening Mammography
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2008; 100(12): 876 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. B. Terry, D. S.M. Buist, A. Trentham-Dietz, T. M. James-Todd, and Y. Liao
Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Change in Mammographic Density: A Cohort Study Using Pharmacy Records on Over 29,000 Postmenopausal Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1088 - 1095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Atkinson, K. M Newton, E. J A. Bowles, M. Yong, and J. W Lampe
Demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors and dietary intakes in relation to daidzein-metabolizing phenotypes among premenopausal women in the United States
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 679 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. M. Boudreau, O. Yu, D. L. Miglioretti, D. S.M. Buist, S. R. Heckbert, and J. R. Daling
Statin Use and Breast Cancer Risk in a Large Population-Based Setting
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 416 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. K.J. Han, S. C. Kobrin, W. M.P. Klein, W. W. Davis, M. Stefanek, and S. H. Taplin
Perceived Ambiguity about Screening Mammography Recommendations: Association with Future Mammography Uptake and Perceptions
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2007; 16(3): 458 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. S.M. Buist, E. J. Aiello, D. L. Miglioretti, and E. White
Mammographic Breast Density, Dense Area, and Breast Area Differences by Phase in the Menstrual Cycle.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2303 - 2306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. J. Aiello, D. S.M. Buist, E. White, and P. L. Porter
Association between Mammographic Breast Density and Breast Cancer Tumor Characteristics
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 662 - 668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. A. Smith, V. Cokkinides, and H. J. Eyre
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer, 2005
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2005; 55(1): 31 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
E. J. Aiello, D. S. M. Buist, E. White, D. Seger, and S. H. Taplin
Rate of Breast Cancer Diagnoses among Postmenopausal Women with Self-Reported Breast Symptoms
J Am Board Fam Med, November 1, 2004; 17(6): 408 - 415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. S. M. Buist, P. L. Porter, C. Lehman, S. H. Taplin, and E. White
Factors Contributing to Mammography Failure in Women Aged 40-49 Years
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 6, 2004; 96(19): 1432 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
J. Lipscomb, M. S. Donaldson, N. K. Arora, M. L. Brown, S. B. Clauser, A. L. Potosky, B. B. Reeve, J. H. Rowland, C. F. Snyder, and S. H. Taplin
Cancer Outcomes Research
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 178 - 197.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Association for Cancer Research.