This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Khlat, M. Articles by Guiguet, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Khlat, M. Articles by Guiguet, M.

Robustness of Case-Control Studies of Genetic Factors to Population Stratification: Magnitude of Bias and Type I Error

¹ Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques, Paris, France and ² Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U535, Villejuif, France

Requests for reprints: Myriam Khlat, Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques, 133 Boulevard Davout, 75980 Paris Cedex 20, France. Phone: 33-1-56-06-21-49; Fax: 33-1-56-06-21-94. Email: Khlat{at}ined.fr

Case-control studies of genetic factors are prone to a special form of confounding called population stratification, whenever the existence of one or more subpopulations may lead to a false association, be it positive or negative. We quantify both the bias (in terms of confounding risk ratio) and the probability of false association (type I error) in the most unfavorable situation in which only one high-risk subpopulation is hidden within the studied population, considering different scenarios of population structuring and varying sample sizes. In accord with previous work, we find that the bias is likely to be small in most cases. In addition, we show that the same applies to the associated type I error whenever the subpopulation is small in proportion. For instance, when the hidden subpopulation makes up 5% of the entire population, with an allelic frequency of 0.25 (versus 0.10) and a disease rate that is double, then the estimated bias is 1.07 and the type I error associated with a sample of 500 cases and 500 controls is 8% (instead of 5%). We also show that the type I error is substantially greater for a rare allele (frequency of 0.1) than for a common allele (frequency of 0.5) and analyze the pattern of increase of vulnerability to stratification bias with sample size. Based on our findings, we may therefore conclude that with moderate sample sizes the type I error associated with population stratification remains very limited in most realistic scenarios.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. A. Rosenberg and M. Nordborg A General Population-Genetic Model for the Production by Population Structure of Spurious Genotype-Phenotype Associations in Discrete, Admixed or Spatially Distributed Populations Genetics, July 1, 2006; 173(3): 1665 - 1678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Rebbeck, C. H. Halbert, and P. Sankar Genetics, Epidemiology, and Cancer Disparities: Is it Black and White? J. Clin. Oncol., May 10, 2006; 24(14): 2164 - 2169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Wang, R. Localio, and T. R. Rebbeck Evaluating Bias due to Population Stratification in Epidemiologic Studies of Gene-Gene or Gene-Environment Interactions Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2006; 15(1): 124 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Rebbeck and P. Sankar Ethnicity, Ancestry, and Race in Molecular Epidemiologic Research Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2005; 14(11): 2467 - 2471. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Riha, P. Brander, M. Vennelle, N. McArdle, S. M. Kerr, N. H. Anderson, and N. J. Douglas Tumour necrosis factor-{alpha} (-308) gene polymorphism in obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2005; 26(4): 673 - 678. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Barnholtz-Sloan, R. Chakraborty, T. A. Sellers, and A. G. Schwartz Examining Population Stratification via Individual Ancestry Estimates versus Self-Reported Race Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1545 - 1551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. A. Heiman, P. Gorroochurn, S. E. Hodge, D. A. Greenberg, M. Khlat, and M.-H. Cazes Robustness of Case-Control Studies to Population Stratification Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2005; 14(6): 1579 - 1582. [Full Text]