
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
The purpose of this study is to explore complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and factors influencing CAM use by women enrolled in a genetic testing program for predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer. A cohort of 236 high-risk women completed baseline questionnaires at enrollment into BRCA1/2 testing program. CAM use and correlates of use were assessed using logistic regression models. CAM was used by 53% of the overall cohort. Cancer survivors reported significantly more use of complementary treatments than did unaffected women (61 versus 42%; P < 0.05). Participants had good overall health behaviors; daily fruit/vegetable consumption was significantly related to CAM use. Increased depression level, knowledge of cancer genetics, and frequency of breast self-examination were significantly associated with using CAM for cancer survivors. Among unaffected women only, cancer risk perception and sunscreen use were significantly correlated with CAM use. Recognition of heightened breast cancer risk is correlated with increased complementary therapy use by unaffected women undergoing genetic testing for cancer predisposition but not to the extent that cancer survivors use these strategies. Any potential effects of the genetic information itself on CAM use, and any possible relationship of CAM use to other risk reduction behaviors, require further research.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. D. Myers, P. B. Jacobsen, Y. Huang, M. H. Frost, C. A. Patten, J. R. Cerhan, and T. A. Sellers Familial and Perceived Risk of Breast Cancer in Relation to Use of Complementary Medicine Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1527 - 1534. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. S. Eschiti Lesson From Comparison of CAM Use by Women With Female-Specific Cancers to Others: It's Time to Focus on Interaction Risks With CAM Therapies Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2007; 6(4): 313 - 344. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. L. Bishop, L. Yardley, and G. T. Lewith A Systematic Review of Beliefs Involved in the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine J Health Psychol, November 1, 2007; 12(6): 851 - 867. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hann, S. Allen, D. Ciambrone, and A. Shah Use of complementary therapies during chemotherapy: influence of patients' satisfaction with treatment decision making and the treating oncologist. Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 224 - 231. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Madlensky, R. A. Vierkant, C. M. Vachon, V. S. Pankratz, J. R. Cerhan, S. T. Vadaparampil, and T. A. Sellers Preventive Health Behaviors and Familial Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2340 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hann, F. Baker, M. Denniston, and N. Entrekin Long-term Breast Cancer Survivors' Use of Complementary Therapies: Perceived Impact on Recovery and Prevention of Recurrence Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2005; 4(1): 14 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sparreboom, M. C. Cox, M. R. Acharya, and W. D. Figg Herbal Remedies in the United States: Potential Adverse Interactions With Anticancer Agents J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2489 - 2503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |