CEBP Infection and Cancer: Biology, Therapeutics, and Prevention Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DiGianni, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garber, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DiGianni, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Garber, J. E.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 12, 321-326, April 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research

Complementary Medicine Use among Women Enrolled in a Genetic Testing Program1

Lisa M. DiGianni2, Haesook T. Kim, Karen Emmons, Rebecca Gelman, Kathy J. Kalkbrenner and Judy E. Garber

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

The purpose of this study is to explore complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use and factors influencing CAM use by women enrolled in a genetic testing program for predisposition to breast/ovarian cancer. A cohort of 236 high-risk women completed baseline questionnaires at enrollment into BRCA1/2 testing program. CAM use and correlates of use were assessed using logistic regression models. CAM was used by 53% of the overall cohort. Cancer survivors reported significantly more use of complementary treatments than did unaffected women (61 versus 42%; P < 0.05). Participants had good overall health behaviors; daily fruit/vegetable consumption was significantly related to CAM use. Increased depression level, knowledge of cancer genetics, and frequency of breast self-examination were significantly associated with using CAM for cancer survivors. Among unaffected women only, cancer risk perception and sunscreen use were significantly correlated with CAM use. Recognition of heightened breast cancer risk is correlated with increased complementary therapy use by unaffected women undergoing genetic testing for cancer predisposition but not to the extent that cancer survivors use these strategies. Any potential effects of the genetic information itself on CAM use, and any possible relationship of CAM use to other risk reduction behaviors, require further research.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. D. Myers, P. B. Jacobsen, Y. Huang, M. H. Frost, C. A. Patten, J. R. Cerhan, and T. A. Sellers
Familial and Perceived Risk of Breast Cancer in Relation to Use of Complementary Medicine
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2008; 17(6): 1527 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
V. S. Eschiti
Lesson From Comparison of CAM Use by Women With Female-Specific Cancers to Others: It's Time to Focus on Interaction Risks With CAM Therapies
Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2007; 6(4): 313 - 344.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health PsycholHome page
F. L. Bishop, L. Yardley, and G. T. Lewith
A Systematic Review of Beliefs Involved in the Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine
J Health Psychol, November 1, 2007; 12(6): 851 - 867.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
D. Hann, S. Allen, D. Ciambrone, and A. Shah
Use of complementary therapies during chemotherapy: influence of patients' satisfaction with treatment decision making and the treating oncologist.
Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 224 - 231.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. Madlensky, R. A. Vierkant, C. M. Vachon, V. S. Pankratz, J. R. Cerhan, S. T. Vadaparampil, and T. A. Sellers
Preventive Health Behaviors and Familial Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2005; 14(10): 2340 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
D. Hann, F. Baker, M. Denniston, and N. Entrekin
Long-term Breast Cancer Survivors' Use of Complementary Therapies: Perceived Impact on Recovery and Prevention of Recurrence
Integr Cancer Ther, March 1, 2005; 4(1): 14 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
A. Sparreboom, M. C. Cox, M. R. Acharya, and W. D. Figg
Herbal Remedies in the United States: Potential Adverse Interactions With Anticancer Agents
J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2489 - 2503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.