CEBP Susan G. Komen for the Cure-AACR Outstanding Investigator Award for Breast Cancer Research Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koehly, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gritz, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koehly, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gritz, E. R.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 12, 304-313, April 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research

A Social Network Analysis of Communication about Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing and Family Functioning1

Laura M. Koehly2, Susan K. Peterson, Beatty G. Watts, Kari K. G. Kempf, Sally W. Vernon and Ellen R. Gritz

Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843-4235 [L. M. K.]; The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas [S. K. P., B. G. W., E. R. G.]; The University of Iowa, Iowa [K. K. G. K.]; and The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Texas [S. W. V.]

Hereditary cancers are relational diseases. A primary focus of research in the past has been the biological relations that exist within the families and how genes are passed along family lines. However, hereditary cancers are relational in a psychosocial sense, as well. They can impact communication relationships within a family, as well as support relationships among family members. Furthermore, the familial culture can affect an individual’s participation in genetic counseling and testing endeavors. Our aims are (a) to describe the composition of familial networks, (b) to characterize the patterns of family functioning within families, (c) to analyze how these patterns relate to communications about genetic counseling and testing among family members, and (d) to identify influential family members. Specifically, we asked how the relationship between mutation status, kinship ties, and family functioning constructs, e.g., communication, cohesion, affective involvement, leadership, and conflict, was associated with discussions about genetic counseling and testing. We used social network analysis and random graph techniques to examine 783 dyadic relationships in 36 members of 5 hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families interviewed from 1999–2000. Results suggest that in these five HNPCC families, two family members are more likely to discuss genetic counseling and testing if either one carries the mutation, if either one is a spouse or a first-degree relative of the other, or if the relationship is defined by positive cohesion, leadership, or lack of conflict. Furthermore, the family functioning patterns suggest that mothers tend to be the most influential persons in the family network. Results of this study suggest encouraging family members who act in the mother role to take a "team approach" with the family proband when discussing HNPCC risks and management with family members.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
A. F. Patenaude, M. Dorval, L. S. DiGianni, K. A. Schneider, A. Chittenden, and J. E. Garber
Sharing BRCA1/2 Test Results With First-Degree Relatives: Factors Predicting Who Women Tell
J. Clin. Oncol., February 1, 2006; 24(4): 700 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
S. K. Peterson
The Role of the Family in Genetic Testing: Theoretical Perspectives, Current Knowledge, and Future Directions
Health Educ Behav, October 1, 2005; 32(5): 627 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. M. Miller, D. J. Bowen, M. K. Campbell, M. A. Diefenbach, E. R. Gritz, P. B. Jacobsen, M. Stefanek, C. Y. Fang, D. Lazovich, K. A. Sherman, et al.
Current Research Promises and Challenges in Behavioral Oncology: Report from the American Society of Preventive Oncology Annual Meeting, 2002
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2004; 13(2): 171 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.