CEBP  09 AM Call for Abstracts w/deadline
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suter, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrander, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suter, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ostrander, E. A.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 12, 127-135, February 2003
© 2003 American Association for Cancer Research

Androgen Receptor (CAG)n and (GGC)n Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer Risk in a Population-Based Case-Control Study of Young Women1

Nicola M. Suter, Kathleen E. Malone2, Janet R. Daling, David R. Doody and Elaine A. Ostrander

Divisions of Clinical Research and Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024 [N. M. S., E. A. O.]; Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024 [K. E. M., J. R. D., D. R. D.]; and School of Public, Health and Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 [K. E. M., J. R. D.]

The androgen receptor (AR) is involved in the regulation of hormone-responsive genes and, as such, variation within the gene is hypothesized to play a role in breast cancer susceptibility. We therefore assessed the relationship between AR repeat variation and breast cancer in young women from the general population. Women diagnosed with breast cancer before age 45 years and age-matched controls, all participants in a population-based case-control study of breast cancer, were assessed for length variation in the (CAG)n and (GGC)n AR repeats within the AR gene. Results were generated from 524 cases and 461 controls. As per previous studies, (CAG)n repeat lengths of <22 were classified as short (S), and those of >=22 were classified as long (L). For (GGC)n repeats, those < 17 were classified as short, and those >= 17 were classified as long. Women with a cumulative (CAG)n repeat size of >=43 showed a modest increase in risk for breast cancer [odds ratio (OR), 1.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.0–1.7]. Women with a (GGC)n long (L) allele and those with a >=33 cumulative repeat size had a decreased risk of breast cancer (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5–0.9). Among women homozygous for the (CAG)n short (S) allele and those with any (GGC)n L allele, an increased risk of breast cancer in relation to ever use of oral contraceptives [OCs; OR = 1.9 (95% CI, 1.0–3.6) and OR = 1.7 (95% CI, 0.9–3.5), respectively] was observed. An increased risk for OC use, however, was not observed among women with the CAG L or GGC S allele. This study, one of the first to examine both (CAG)n and (GGC)n in a population-based study for its relation to breast cancer risk, suggests a reduced risk in young women with (GGC)n repeat lengths of >=17. In addition, these data suggest that AR repeat length may be partly responsible for the increased risk for early-onset breast cancer in women who use OCs, although these findings need replication in other populations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
F. Lose, D. L. Duffy, G. F. Kay, Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Resea, M. A. Kedda, and A. B. Spurdle
Skewed X Chromosome Inactivation and Breast and Ovarian Cancer Status: Evidence for X-Linked Modifiers of BRCA1
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 5, 2008; 100(21): 1519 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Wedren, C. Magnusson, K. Humphreys, H. Melhus, A. Kindmark, F. Stiger, M. Branting, I. Persson, J. Baron, and E. Weiderpass
Associations between Androgen and Vitamin D Receptor Microsatellites and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1775 - 1783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. N. Birrell, L. M. Butler, J. M. Harris, G. Buchanan, and W. D. Tilley
Disruption of androgen receptor signaling by synthetic progestins may increase risk of developing breast cancer
FASEB J, August 1, 2007; 21(10): 2285 - 2293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Mol EndocrinolHome page
F. F Brockschmidt, M. M Nothen, and A. M Hillmer
The two most common alleles of the coding GGN repeat in the androgen receptor gene cause differences in protein function
J. Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 39(1): 1 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
M. Hietala, T. Sandberg, A. Borg, H. Olsson, and H. Jernstrom
Testosterone levels in relation to oral contraceptive use and the androgen receptor CAG and GGC length polymorphisms in healthy young women
Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2007; 22(1): 83 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
W. Wang, E. M. John, and S. A. Ingles
Androgen Receptor and Prostate-Specific Antigen Gene Polymorphisms and Breast Cancer in African-American Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2005; 14(12): 2990 - 2994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. L. Terry, I. De Vivo, L. Titus-Ernstoff, M.-C. Shih, and D. W. Cramer
Androgen Receptor Cytosine, Adenine, Guanine Repeats, and Haplotypes in Relation to Ovarian Cancer Risk
Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 65(13): 5974 - 5981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
W. Somboonporn and S. R. Davis
Testosterone Effects on the Breast: Implications for Testosterone Therapy for Women
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 374 - 388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. O. Lillie, L. Bernstein, S. A. Ingles, W. J. Gauderman, G. E. Rivas, V. Gagalang, T. Krontiris, and G. Ursin
Polymorphism in the Androgen Receptor and Mammographic Density in Women Taking and Not Taking Estrogen and Progestin Therapy
Cancer Res., February 15, 2004; 64(4): 1237 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Liede, W. Zhang, M. L. D. L. Matsuda, A. Tan, and S. A. Narod
Androgen Receptor Gene Polymorphism and Breast Cancer Susceptibility in the Philippines
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2003; 12(9): 848 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Association for Cancer Research.