CEBP  Translational Cancer Medicine 2008: Cancer Clinical Trials and Personalized Medicine
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wardle, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baker, A. H.
Right arrow Articles by Wardle, J.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 11, 203-206, February 2002
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Short Communications

Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Intake Among Adults Attending Colorectal Cancer Screening

The Efficacy of a Brief Tailored Intervention1

Anna H. Baker and Jane Wardle2

Health Behavior Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom

Fruits and vegetables appear to confer protection against several cancers, but most adults in the United Kingdom eat substantially less than the recommended amounts. Cancer screening services could provide a valuable context in which to provide advice on increasing fruit and vegetable intake. This study examined the efficacy of a brief, tailored, psycho-educational intervention for increasing fruit and vegetable intake, carried out in a cancer screening clinic. The study was a randomized, controlled trial. 742 participants, 55–64 years of age, recruited from three cancer screening clinics, completed a baseline questionnaire. They were assigned either to the tailored intervention group or to an untreated control group. The primary outcome measure was self-reported consumption of fruit and vegetables. At 6 week follow-up there were significant increases in daily servings of fruit and vegetables in the tailored intervention group (CI, 0.87–1.25) compared with the untreated group (CI, 0.08–0.43). These results support the efficacy of a simple, written message, which is tailored to the intake and knowledge levels of the individual, for modifying cancer-protective dietary behaviors, at least in the short term. They also suggest that cancer screening clinics may be a good context for providing this service.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
K.J. Dyer, K.C.H. Fearon, K. Buckner, and R.A. Richardson
Diet and colorectal cancer risk: Evaluation of a nutrition education leaflet
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2005; 64(3): 247 - 255.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Education JournalHome page
K.J. Dyer, K C H Fearon, K. Buckner, and R.A. Richardson
Diet and colorectal cancer risk: Baseline dietary knowledge of colorectal patients
Health Education Journal, January 1, 2004; 63(3): 242 - 253.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Miles, J. Wardle, K. McCaffery, S. Williamson, and W. Atkin
The Effects of Colorectal Cancer Screening on Health Attitudes and Practices
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2003; 12(7): 651 - 655.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Cell Growth & Differentiation
Copyright © 2002 by the American Association for Cancer Research.