CEBP Meeting Calendar Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peshkin, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peshkin, B. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lerman, C.
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Vol. 11, 1115-1118, October 2002
© 2002 American Association for Cancer Research


Short Communications

Utilization of Breast Cancer Screening in a Clinically Based Sample of Women after BRCA1/2 Testing1

Beth N. Peshkin2, Marc D. Schwartz, Claudine Isaacs, Chanita Hughes, David Main and Caryn Lerman

Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007 [B. N. P., M. D. S., C. I., D. M.], and Cancer Center and Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [C. H., C. L.]

We conducted a prospective, observational study to determine breast cancer screening practices among self-referred high-risk women who pursued genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Of the 107 unaffected women included in this study, 41 were BRCA1/2 carriers and 66 women tested negative for a mutation previously identified in their family. All of the women underwent comprehensive pre- and posttest genetic counseling, and completed baseline and 12-month follow-up telephone interviews. The baseline (pretest) interview assessed potential predictors of mammography use, including demographics and psychosocial variables. During the year after the receipt of BRCA1/2 test results, 47% of the noncarriers and 59% of the carriers reported that they had had a mammogram [{chi}2 (1, n = 107) = 1.35; P = 0.24]. Only 39% of carriers ages 25–39 reported having a mammogram, versus 74% of carriers age >=40 [{chi}2 (1, n = 41) = 5.10; P = 0.02]. Among noncarriers ages 50 and older, 83% had an annual mammogram. Factors independently associated with mammography use included age (<40, >=40; odds ratio, 7.5; confidence interval, 2.6–21.5) and test result (odds ratio, 4.6; confidence interval, 1.1–18.7). The effects of perceived likelihood of having a BRCA1/2 gene alteration and the interaction between test result and perceived likelihood were not significant. As expected, most carriers (95%) and noncarriers (77%) obtained a clinical breast exam within the year after the receipt of test results. These data suggest that in carriers, overall, the use of breast cancer screening including mammography is good, although there was a relatively low uptake rate of mammography in younger carriers. Noncarriers had very good adherence to general population screening guidelines.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
S.-J. Dawson, M. A. Price, M. A. Jenkins, J. M. McKinley, P. N. Butow, S.-A. McLachlan, G. J. Lindeman, P. Weideman, M. L. Friedlander, J. L. Hopper, et al.
Cancer Risk Management Practices of Noncarriers Within BRCA1/2 Mutation-Positive Families in the Kathleen Cuningham Foundation Consortium for Research Into Familial Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2008; 26(2): 225 - 232.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
H. M. Ashour and A. El-Sharif
Microbial Spectrum and Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Gram-Positive Aerobic Bacteria Isolated From Cancer Patients
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2007; 25(36): 5763 - 5769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S. Wainberg and J. Husted
Utilization of Screening and Preventive Surgery Among Unaffected Carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Mutation
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 1989 - 1995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. W. Hadley, J. F. Jenkins, E. Dimond, M. de Carvalho, I. Kirsch, and C. G.S. Palmer
Colon Cancer Screening Practices After Genetic Counseling and Testing for Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2004; 22(1): 39 - 44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
M. D. Schwartz, E. Kaufman, B. N. Peshkin, C. Isaacs, C. Hughes, T. DeMarco, C. Finch, and C. Lerman
Bilateral Prophylactic Oophorectomy and Ovarian Cancer Screening Following BRCA1/BRCA2 Mutation Testing
J. Clin. Oncol., November 1, 2003; 21(21): 4034 - 4041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 2002 by the American Association for Cancer Research.