This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Engelstad, L. P. Articles by Hiatt, R. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Engelstad, L. P. Articles by Hiatt, R. A.

Abnormal Pap Smear Follow-Up in a High-Risk Population¹

Alameda County Medical Center (Highland Hospital Campus), Oakland California 94602 [L. P. E., M. M. R.]; Northern California Cancer Center, California [L. P. E., S. L. S., B. H. N., R. J. P.]; San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California [K. L. B.]; and Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [R. A. H.]

Low-income women are at high risk of developing cervical cancer attributable not only to the higher prevalence of risk factors in this population but also to the lack of timely follow-up of abnormal Pap smears. This study evaluates the efficacy of an aggressive follow-up strategy. Women with abnormal Pap smear results after screening in a public hospital emergency department were randomly assigned to follow-up either by a case-managed approach using computerized tracking and universal colposcopy or by traditional care. The main outcome was the proportion of women receiving follow-up in 6 months. A secondary outcome was the proportion of women receiving follow-up by 6 months and diagnostic resolution in 18 months. Of 54 women in the intervention group, 65% kept at least one follow-up appointment in 6 months compared with 41% of the 54 women in the control group (P = 0.012). Half the women in the intervention group versus 19% of women in the control group had follow-up in 6 months and diagnostic resolution in 18 months (P = 0.001). After adjusting for age, initial Pap smear result, and race/ethnicity, the odds of having follow-up in 6 months were four times greater for women in the intervention group (odds ratio = 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–9.7), and the odds of having both follow-up in 6 months and diagnostic resolution in 18 months were more than six times greater (odds ratio = 6.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.4–17.8). This study demonstrates that an aggressive follow-up strategy significantly improves the rate of both initial follow-up and diagnostic resolution of abnormal Pap smears among low-income women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance when compared with traditional care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Magai, N. S. Consedine, B. A. Adjei, D. Hershman, and A. Neugut Psychosocial Influences on Suboptimal Adjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment Adherence Among African American Women: Implications for Education and Intervention Health Educ Behav, December 1, 2008; 35(6): 835 - 854. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Coker, S. M. Bond, and L. A. Pirisi Life Stressors Are an Important Reason for Women Discontinuing Follow-up Care for Cervical Neoplasia. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 321 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. R. Yabroff, C. N. Klabunde, R. Myers, and M. L. Brown Physician Recommendations for Follow-Up of Positive Fecal Occult Blood Tests Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2005; 62(1): 79 - 110. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. R. Yabroff, K. S. Washington, A. Leader, E. Neilson, and J. Mandelblatt Is the Promise of Cancer-Screening Programs Being Compromised? Quality of Follow-Up Care after Abnormal Screening Results Med Care Res Rev, September 1, 2003; 60(3): 294 - 331. [Abstract] [PDF]