CEBP  09 AM Call for Abstracts w/deadline
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stefanek, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Huelskamp, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stefanek, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Huelskamp, A. M.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 1, Issue 7 591-596, Copyright © 1992 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

Breast self-examination proficiency and training effects: women at increased risk of breast cancer

ME Stefanek, P Wilcox and AM Huelskamp
Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

While breast self-examination (BSE) frequency has received extensive research attention, proficiency has been less frequently addressed. Moreover, BSE proficiency among women at increased risk has not been adequately examined. Assessment of BSE proficiency is critical in determining the value of BSE with mammography and clinical breast examination in the early detection of breast cancer. BSE proficiency was assessed in 101 first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. Participants were stratified by BSE frequency and randomized to one of two training techniques (MammaCare or concentric circle). BSE performance was assessed at baseline and at three follow-up visits at 4-month intervals. Proficiency was assessed by verbal description, a projected grid observational method, and lump detection ability on two breast models. BSE frequency was also assessed, in addition to BSE confidence, knowledge of breast cancer, risk perception, and worry related to breast cancer development. At baseline, proficiency was poor and correlations were not significant across assessment modalities. Significant improvement occurred on self-report measures, lump detection ability (true positives) on both models, and the projected grid. Improvement occurred across both training groups by the first follow-up, with no changes at subsequent visits. Both training techniques significantly improved BSE proficiency and were viewed positively by participants.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. Stefanek, L. Hartmann, and W. Nelson
Risk-Reduction Mastectomy: Clinical Issues and Research Needs
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 5, 2001; 93(17): 1297 - 1297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
K. Brain, P. Norman, J. Gray, and R. Mansel
Anxiety and Adherence to Breast Self-Examination in Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer
Psychosom Med, March 1, 1999; 61(2): 181 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.