CEBP CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2008 Conference on Cancer Prevention - Washington, D.C.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirvish, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nie, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirvish, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Nie, G.

Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, Vol 1, Issue 6 455-461, Copyright © 1992 by American Association for Cancer Research


ARTICLES

N-nitrosoproline excretion by rural Nebraskans drinking water of varied nitrate content

SS Mirvish, AC Grandjean, H Moller, S Fike, T Maynard, L Jones, S Rosinsky and G Nie
Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198-6805.

The N-nitrosoproline (NPRO) test for in vivo nitrosation was applied in a study of 44 rural Nebraska men drinking high- or low-nitrate water from private wells. The subjects followed diets low in NPRO and nitrate for 5 days. On days 4 and 5 they avoided ascorbate-rich foods. Urine was collected for 24 h on day 4 while the subjects followed normal activities and on day 5 after an overnight fast and taking 500 mg L-proline. We determined NPRO, nitrate, creatinine, and specific gravity in the urines, and nitrite and nitrate in single saliva specimens collected on days 4 and 5. Results for all variables were separated into those above and below the median values and were analyzed by univariate and multivariate consideration of the contingency tables. Nitrate concentration in drinking water (> or = or < 10 ppm nitrate-nitrogen) was significantly associated with both day 4 and day 5 NPRO (> or = or < 1.5 micrograms/day; P < 0.04); and with urine nitrate (> or = or < 1.5 mmol/day), saliva nitrite (> or = or < 5 mg/liter), and saliva nitrate (> or = or < 25 mg/liter) (P < or = 0.002). Urine nitrate was significantly (P < or = 0.03) associated with both day 4 and day 5 NPRO, with odds ratios of 4.2 and 5.4, respectively. Creatinine was positively associated with NPRO on day 4 (P = 0.04). These findings, like those of a recent study in Denmark, showed an association between nitrate intake in water and NPRO formation. Their significance for people drinking high-nitrate water remains to be determined.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
W J Lee, W Lijinsky, E F Heineman, R S Markin, D D Weisenburger, and M H Ward
Agricultural pesticide use and adenocarcinomas of the stomach and oesophagus
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2004; 61(9): 743 - 749.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. Coss, K. P. Cantor, J. S. Reif, C. F. Lynch, and M. H. Ward
Pancreatic Cancer and Drinking Water and Dietary Sources of Nitrate and Nitrite
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2004; 159(7): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online
Copyright © 1992 by the American Association for Cancer Research.